Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

 

Below are the guidelines for submitting manuscripts to Smart Design Policies. Please note that all authors must carefully follow these instructions to avoid desk rejection or delays in the review process.

 

Before Beginning the Submission Process

We recommend that prospective authors familiarize themselves with the journal’s section policies and Manuscript Preparation Guidelines. You must register with Smart Design Policies before submitting a manuscript; if already registered, simply log in and begin the five-step online submission procedure. All submissions should adhere to the standards of Smart Design Policies. Submissions failing to meet these criteria may be declined without peer review.

 

New Submissions

All new manuscripts should be submitted via our online platform. You will be guided step by step in creating and uploading your documents, ensuring a more efficient editorial workflow, peer review process, and eventual publication.

Please submit your article through our journal’s submission portal.

 

Minimum Submission Requirements

To initiate the review process, authors are required to upload at least three files:

  1. Cover Letter
  2. Manuscript Files
    • Version for Review (without author details)
    • Version for Records (with author details)

Ensure that all authors have an ORCID iD and that your ORCID profile is up to date. This allows our editors to verify your previous work. You can register for an ORCID iD at https://orcid.org.

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

Before submitting your work, confirm that:

  1. The submission is original and not under consideration by any other publication.
  2. A separate cover letter includes all authors’ titles, names, affiliations, email addresses, and ORCID iDs.
  3. You have prepared two versions of your manuscript: one without author details (for blind review) and one with author details (for our records).
  4. You have completed and attached the Publication Metadata Form.
  5. The manuscript file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF format.
  6. DOI numbers and URLs are provided for references where available.
  7. The text is double-spaced, uses a 12-point font, employs italics instead of underlining, and places figures/tables within the text rather than at the end.
  8. The manuscript complies with the stylistic and bibliographic criteria outlined in these Author Guidelines.
  9. You have run a plagiarism check (e.g., using iThenticate, DupliChecker, Grammarly, or PlagTracker) to detect and correct any accidental overlap.

Note: Your submission will be evaluated for originality via CrossCheck. More information can be found on the CrossCheck Plagiarism Screening System.

 

Manuscript Structure

Your manuscript should include the following major sections:

  • Abstract
  1. Introduction
  2. Materials and Methods
  3. Results
  4. Discussion
  5. Conclusions

After the Conclusions and before the References, please include:

  • Acknowledgements
  • Funding
  • Conflict of Interests
  • Ethics Statements
  • CRediT Authorship Contribution Statements

Literature Citations: Manuscripts lacking adequate and up-to-date references risk immediate rejection. Ensure you cite current and relevant research in the field.

Language Clarity: The manuscript should be written clearly and intelligibly for an international readership. If possible, have a native English speaker or a professional editor with subject-matter expertise review your text.

Content Relevance: The paper’s subject matter should align with the title and fall within the scope of Smart Design Policies.

Grant Support: If any grants or financial support were provided, acknowledge them appropriately.

Article Subdivision: Number sections and subsections sequentially (e.g., 1, 1.1, 1.1.1, etc.). The abstract should not be numbered.

In-text Citations: Every reference cited in the main text must appear in the reference list, and all references listed should be cited in the text. Avoid citations in the abstract.

Reference List: Arrange references alphabetically (and chronologically if necessary).

Reference Style: Please use APA (7th edition). Include DOI numbers where available. Prefer references from the last five years and refrain from using unverified web sources.

Tip: Reference management tools like EndNote, Mendeley, or Microsoft Word’s built-in referencing feature can help keep citations consistent.

Formatting: Prepare manuscripts in Microsoft Word (A4 size). Use Times New Roman, 12-point font for the abstract, keywords, and main text. The text (including references and appendices) should not exceed 8,000 words. Use italics for emphasis or quotations.

Important: Manuscripts that do not conform to these formatting requirements may be returned without consideration.

Your final manuscript should be organized as follows:

  • Title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Highlights
  • Contribution to the Field Statement
  • Introduction
  • Materials and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Funding
  • Conflict of Interests
  • Data Availability Statement
  • CRediT Author Statement
  • Appendices

 

Title

Provide a concise and meaningful title that reflects the core contribution of your work. Restrict the title to no more than 15 words. Avoid abbreviations or acronyms in the title.

 

Abstract

Offer a single-paragraph summary (up to 200 words) that outlines:

  • Introduction and Purpose: Briefly note why your study matters.
  • Problem Statement: Specify the challenge or knowledge gap.
  • Methods: Describe your approach or data sources.
  • Results: Highlight your key findings.
  • Implications: Indicate how your research advances the field or practice.

Avoid acronyms, tables, figures, in-text citations, or extraneous details in the abstract.

Writing Tips:

  • Draft the abstract after the full manuscript is complete.
  • Focus on the paper’s purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • Create a rough version, then refine.
  • Request feedback from a colleague.

 

Keywords

Include 4–6 keywords, each composed of two to three words (e.g., “urban sustainability strategies”). Avoid single-word keywords to reduce irrelevant search hits. Spell out any acronyms.

 

Highlights

Provide a few brief bullet points (each 75 characters or fewer) that summarize:

  • Key innovations or new insights in your paper.
  • Methods or models introduced or applied.
  • Potential impact or implications for policy, design, or future research.

Examples:

  • Demonstrates a systemic approach to analyzing sustainable design models.
  • Proposes an innovative framework for integrating climate-responsive materials.
  • Establishes a clear link between open-space planning and mental well-being.

Note: Highlights are required for submission.

 

Contribution to the Field Statement

In about 50 words, succinctly describe your manuscript’s unique contribution to existing scholarship. Emphasize the novelty and significance of your findings in a manner accessible to both specialists and non-specialists.

Examples:

  • This article presents a novel methodology for evaluating design policies that promote occupant well-being.
  • The study proposes a new ecosystem-based approach, enhancing urban resilience through mindful architectural practices.
  • Pioneers a comparative framework for assessing the salutogenic effects of daylight in different cultural contexts.

 

  1. Introduction

Set the stage for your research by:

  • Research Context
    • Emphasize the significance of the topic.
    • Summarize the current state of knowledge.
  • Research Niche
    • Identify gaps in existing studies or assumptions.
    • Pose relevant research questions or hypotheses.
  • Your Research
    • State the specific aims of the study.
    • Outline key features, results, and overall structure.

Tip: Finalize the introduction after completing the other sections.

 

  1. Materials and Methods

Supply detailed information to allow replication of your study. If your methods have been published before, cite the original source and note any modifications.

Do:

  • Clearly describe materials, equipment, and conditions.
  • Use subheadings to organize the information.
  • Explain data collection procedures.
  • Mention ethical compliance where applicable.
  • Cite established protocols.
  • Specify software and analytical tools.
  • Define variables, controls, and statistical approaches.

Don’t:

  • Provide vague or incomplete descriptions.
  • Include interpretation of results.
  • Rely on excessive jargon.

 

  1. Results

Present findings objectively, without interpretation.

Do:

  • Use tables and figures for clarity and brevity.
  • Include all significant findings, whether they support your hypothesis or not.
  • Maintain a logical sequence.
  • Reference relevant tables and figures in-text.

Don’t:

  • Discuss or interpret results here.
  • Omit unexpected or negative findings without explanation.
  • Duplicate data in multiple forms (e.g., text and tables).

 

  1. Discussion

Explain the meaning and implications of your results.

Do:

  • Connect findings to your research questions and previous studies.
  • Discuss theoretical, practical, or policy implications.
  • Address any anomalies or limitations.
  • Suggest future research directions.

Don’t:

  • Simply restate results.
  • Overreach claims.
  • Introduce new data.

 

  1. Conclusions

Concisely summarize your main conclusions.

Do:

  • Clearly answer the initial research questions.
  • Emphasize the significance and originality of the study.
  • Propose real-world or future research implications.

Don’t:

  • Introduce new information or data.
  • Repeat the entire abstract or methodology.

 

Acknowledgements

Recognize individuals and organizations that contributed to your work but do not qualify for authorship.

Do:

  • Thank those who provided assistance, funding, or other resources.
  • Specify the nature of their contributions.
  • Maintain a respectful, formal tone.

Don’t:

  • Include co-authors or those who have not consented to be acknowledged.

 

Funding
Clearly state any financial support or grant details.

  • No Funding: If there was no external financial support, include a statement such as, “This study was not funded by any public, private, or nonprofit entity.”
  • With Funding: Where applicable, specify the funding agency and grant number. For instance, “This research was funded by [Funding Agency], Grant Number [XXXXXXX].”

 

CRediT Author Statement
To enhance transparency, outline the specific contributions of each author according to the CRediT taxonomy (e.g., Conceptualization, Data Curation). For further details and role descriptions, refer to widely available CRediT guidelines.

 

Conflict of Interests
Disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If there are none, include a statement such as, “The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to declare.”

 

Data Availability Statement
Specify where and how the data supporting your findings can be accessed. If relevant, include links or DOIs for repositories. For additional information on drafting these statements, consult standard data availability guidelines.

 

Appendices
If you have more than one appendix, label them A, B, and so on. Number any equations independently within each appendix and apply the same approach for tables and figures.

 

Footnotes and Abbreviations
Use footnotes sparingly. They should only include ancillary text if absolutely necessary. Whenever abbreviations appear in tables or figures, provide a clear explanation either in the table caption or figure legend.

 

Responding to Reviewers’ Comments

When you receive feedback requesting revisions—whether substantial or minor—it means the editorial team sees value in your submission to Smart Design Policies. Although revisions can be demanding, you should strategize carefully to address every point raised by the reviewers and editors:

  1. Understand Reviewer Perspectives: Reviewers want to see meaningful improvements to your manuscript. They assess your academic rigor and ability to incorporate multiple viewpoints.
  2. Thorough Responses: If reviewers perceive your revisions or explanations as insufficient, they may opt to reject the manuscript. Your goal is to respond comprehensively and professionally.

 

Minimum Requirements for Submitting the Revised Manuscript

When you are ready to resubmit, please ensure that you include the following:

  1. Rebuttal Letter: Address the reviewers directly. Clarify any misunderstandings, defend your approach when necessary, and highlight what you have changed. Usually authored by the corresponding author, this letter should reference the manuscript’s details.
  2. Author’s Response to Reviewers and Editor Comments: Provide a detailed document explaining how you resolved each comment. Where you did not agree with a suggestion, offer a justified rationale.
  3. Tracked Changes Document: Supply a version of your revised manuscript that displays all modifications. Tools like Microsoft Word’s “Track Changes” are recommended.
  4. Clean Version: Include a polished copy without markup, showing the final, cohesive text. This version is typically submitted as the main manuscript file.

These documents are critical to expedite the review. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

What Authors Should Do During Revision

Selectively Address Comments: Even if you believe a comment is minor, showing your willingness to accommodate feedback reflects positively on your openness.

Document Changes Clearly: Use tracked changes or highlighting to show exactly what was altered.

Maintain Separate Versions: Keep your tracked-changes file apart from the clean version of the manuscript.

Individual Responses: Address each point raised by reviewers separately, justifying your approach if you choose not to implement a suggestion.

Be Comprehensive: Provide a thorough response to each comment.

Stay Appreciative: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and input. They are volunteering their efforts to refine your work.

Remain Courteous in Disagreements: If you disagree with a reviewer, present your stance respectfully and back it with evidence or supplementary materials.

 

What Authors Should Avoid During Revision

Overlooking Comments: Do not ignore issues raised by reviewers. Either make the requested changes or explain why you did not.

Ending with Generic Remarks: Avoid concluding with broad statements such as, “Thank you for reviewing our paper.” Instead, emphasize specific revisions you have made.

Blaming Reviewers for Confusion: If the reviewer did not understand something, clarify your writing rather than assuming reviewer error.

One-Word Replies: Even for minor edits, describe what was corrected. For bigger concerns, consider providing an apology if a significant error was identified.

Evasive Behavior: Do not sidestep direct questions. Failing to answer specific concerns could result in rejection.

Vague Descriptions of Changes: Rather than saying, “We have made the changes,” detail the exact nature of the edits.

Personalizing Comments: Maintain a professional, objective tone and do not take critique personally.

 

Further Reading and Guidance

  1. How to Respond to Reviewers’ Comments: A Practical Guide for Authors by Cristina N.
  2. How to Respond to Reviewer Comments – The CALM Way by Catherine Carnovale.
  3. How to Write an Effective “Response to Reviewers” Letter by Jeff Offutt.

 

Reference Style
Manuscripts submitted to Smart Design Policies should follow the guidelines of the American Psychological Association (APA), 7th edition. This style is frequently used in social sciences and related fields. For specific details, we recommend consulting the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.) or reputable online resources.

 

Journal Articles

Format

  • Author(s). (Year). Title of the article. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

  • Yang, T. L., & Suarez, M. (2024). The relationship between design interventions and occupant well-being. Journal of Urban Health Policy, 10(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1101/juhp.2024.0035

 

Books

Format

Example

  • Perez, R. C. (2023). Designing Spaces for Community Engagement (2nd ed.). Urban Life Press. https://doi.org/10.5678/ulp.2023.015

 

Book Chapters

Format

  • Author(s) of Chapter. (Year). Title of the chapter. In Editor(s) (Ed.), Title of the book (pp. page range). Publisher. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

  • Carter, G., & Simon, L. (2024). Reimagining public squares for social well-being. In J. Robles & A. Singh (Eds.), Advances in Urban Environment Research (pp. 98–112). NextCity Press. https://doi.org/10.2345/nextcity.2024.019

 

Translated Books

Format

  • Author(s). (Year). Title of the book (Translator's Name, Trans.). Publisher. (Original work published Year)

Example

  • Müller, F. (2022). Architektur und Gesundheit (A. Rossi, Trans.). WellSpace Publishers. (Original work published 2010)

 

Book Reviews

Format

  • Reviewer, A. A. (Year). [Review of the book Title of book, by B. B. Author]. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

  • Huang, P. (2024). [Review of the book Healthy Cities in Practice, by J. Delgado]. Journal of Architectural Innovations, 16(2), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.7891/jai.2024.0145

 

Theses and Dissertations

  1. Published Thesis or Dissertation
    • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of thesis or dissertation [Doctoral dissertation/Master’s thesis, Institution]. Database or Repository Name. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

    • Kim, H. S. (2023). Light and Well-Being: Integrative Strategies in Building Design [Doctoral dissertation, Green City University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://doi.org/10.9999/proquest.2023.5567
  1. Unpublished Thesis or Dissertation
    • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of thesis or dissertation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation/master’s thesis]. Institution.

Example

    • Thompson, D. R. (2022). Community-Driven Urban Renovations [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Metropolitan School of Design.

 

Conference Papers

  1. Published Conference Paper
    • Author(s). (Year, Month Day–Day). Title of paper [Paper presentation]. Conference Name, Location. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

    • Li, X., & Morales, S. (2024, June 12–14). Incorporating wellbeing metrics into architectural design [Paper presentation]. Global Wellbeing in Architecture Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.4567/gwac.2024.011
  1. Conference Proceedings (Book Form)
    • Author(s). (Year). Title of paper. In Editor(s) (Eds.), Proceedings Title (pp. page range). Publisher. https://doi.org/DOI

Example

    • Jensen, M. (2024). Evolving energy-efficient materials. In P. Carter & D. Nguyen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Future Materials Symposium (pp. 200–212). EcoBuild Press. https://doi.org/10.5678/fms.2024.0020

 

Newspaper and Magazine Articles

  1. Newspaper Article
    • Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of the article. Newspaper Name, pages.

Example

    • Alvarado, J. (2024, March 18). Revitalizing city centers for inclusive growth. The Metro Times, pp. B2, B4.
  1. Magazine Article
    • Author, A. A. (Year, Month). Title of the article. Magazine Name, page range.

Example

    • Daniels, H. (2024, May). Emerging trends in human-centered design. Design Today, 40–46.

 

Electronic Resources

  1. Online Article
    • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the article. Website or Online Journal Name. URL

Example

    • Mills, P. (2024). Reimagining public housing with green technology. Digital Urban Review. Retrieved from https://www.digitalurbanreview.com/green-tech
  1. Software
    • Company/Developer. (Year). Title of software (Version) [Computer software]. Website

Example

    • CityAnalytics Inc. (2024). Urban Planner Pro (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.cityanalytics.com/urbanplannerpro
  1. Datasets
    • Organization. (Year). Title of data set [Data set]. URL

Example

    • Global Health Institute. (2024). Global City Environment Dataset [Data set]. Retrieved from https://www.ghi.org/data/gced

 

Lecture Notes and Presentations

  • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of presentation [Format]. Institution or Lecture Series. URL

Example

  • Ross, G. (2024). Sustainability in Historic Districts [PowerPoint slides]. Heritage Preservation Lecture Series. Retrieved from https://www.heritagelectureseries.org/presentations

 

Reports

  • Authoring Organization or Author. (Year). Title of report. URL

Example

  • Urban Redevelopment Agency. (2023). Annual Report on Sustainable Neighborhoods. Retrieved from https://www.uragency.gov/reports/sus-neighborhoods-2023

 

Press Releases

  • Organization. (Year, Month Day). Title of press release [Press release]. URL

Example

  • Healthy Building Council. (2024, January 10). Announcing the Community Health Initiative [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.hbc.org/news/community-health-initiative

 

Blog Posts

  • Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of the post. Blog Name. URL

Example

  • Garner, L. (2024, February 27). Biophilic design: A revolution in urban architecture. EcoDesign Insights Blog. Retrieved from https://www.ecodesigninsightsblog.com/biophilic-revolution

 

Social Media Posts

  • Author/Organization [@Username]. (Year, Month Day). Content up to the first 20 words [Social media platform]. URL

Example

 

Podcasts

  • Host, A. A. (Host). (Year). Title of episode [Audio podcast episode]. In Podcast Name. URL

Example

  • Rivera, C. (Host). (2024). Designing for resilience [Audio podcast episode]. In The Future of Cities Podcast. Retrieved from https://www.futureofcitiespodcast.com/episodes/resilience

 

Videos

  • Producer/Organization. (Year, Month Day). Title of video [Video]. Platform. URL

Example

 

Dictionary or Encyclopedia Entries

  • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of entry. In Editor’s Name (Ed.), Encyclopedia Title (pp. xx–xx). Publisher.

Example

  • Lambert, D. (2024). Therapeutic landscapes. In M. Cole (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Health (pp. 1023–1024). HealthWorks Press.

 

Organizational Reports

  • Organization Name. (Year). Title of report. Retrieved from URL

Example

  • Global Green Building Alliance. (2024). Building for Tomorrow: Sustainable Practices and Innovations. Retrieved from https://www.globalgba.org/bft2024

 

Webpages and Online Documents

  • Organization/Author. (Year). Title of document. URL

Example

  • Green Energy Agency. (2024). Guidelines for Eco-Friendly Retrofitting. Retrieved from https://www.greenenergyagency.org/retrofit-guidelines

 

Software

  • Developer. (Year). Software name (Version) [Computer software]. Publisher/Website

Example

  • LightLab Innovations. (2024). DaylightMax (Version 3.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.lightlabinnovations.com/daylightmax

 

Note: For additional details on proper APA formatting, please consult official APA resources or the websites of accredited universities and libraries.

 

Number of Authors in In-text Citations

  1. One Author
    • Narrative: “Chan (2024) emphasizes…”
    • Parenthetical: “(Chan, 2024)”
  2. Two Authors
    • Narrative: “Chan and Liu (2023) propose…”
    • Parenthetical: “(Chan & Liu, 2023)”
  3. Three or More Authors
    • Narrative: “Rivera et al. (2022) discovered…”
    • Parenthetical: “(Rivera et al., 2022)”
  4. Groups or Organizations as Authors
    • First citation:
      • Narrative: “International Health Organization (IHO, 2023) reports…”
      • Parenthetical: “(International Health Organization [IHO], 2023)”
    • Subsequent citations:
      • Narrative: “IHO (2023) further explains…”
      • Parenthetical: “(IHO, 2023)”
  5. Works with the Same Author and Year
    • In-text:
      • “Lee (2024a) explores…”
      • “Lee (2024b) also examines…”
    • Reference list:
      • Lee, C. (2024a). Title of article one. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.
      • Lee, C. (2024b). Title of article two. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.

 

Citing References in the Text

  • Two Authors: Always cite both surnames:
    • Narrative: “As noted by Santos and Abe (2023)…”
    • Parenthetical: “(Santos & Abe, 2023)”
  • Three or More Authors: Use “et al.” following the first author’s last name:
    • Narrative: “Wang et al. (2022) found that…”
    • Parenthetical: “(Wang et al., 2022)”
  • No Author: Use the title (or a shortened version):
    • “(‘Impacts of Green Roofs,’ 2024)”
  • Anonymous Work: Use “Anonymous”:
    • “(Anonymous, 2024)”
  • Authors with the Same Last Name: Include initials:
    • “(L. Garcia, 2023; M. Garcia, 2023)”
  • Multiple Works by the Same Author: List years in chronological order:
    • “(Andrews, 2020, 2022, 2023)”
  • Secondary Sources:
    • “(Clarke, 2019, as cited in Johnson, 2024)”
  • Direct Quotations: Provide page numbers:
    • “(Lee, 2023, p. 76)”
  • Personal Communications: Cite in text only:
    • “(M. Davies, personal communication, August 14, 2024)”
  • Non-English Sources: Provide an English translation of the title in brackets.

 

Referencing Tables and Figures in the Text

Use their designated numbers:

  • “Table 1 displays the survey results…”
  • “As shown in Figure 2…”

 

Direct Quotes in APA Style

Include author, date, and page number:

  1. Short Quotations (fewer than 40 words)
    • “Incorporating greenery into urban spaces can improve mental health” (Liu, 2023, p. 30).
  2. Long Quotations (40 words or more)
    • Indent as a block without quotation marks.

 

Abbreviations in APA References

Some common abbreviations include:

  • Edition: ed.
  • Editor(s): Ed. or Eds.
  • No date: n.d.
  • Page(s): p. or pp.
  • Volume(s): Vol. or Vols.

 

Reference Management Software

We recommend using tools like MendeleyEndNote, or Zotero to streamline citation and reference list formatting.

 

English Editing and Proofreading

Manuscripts must be presented in clear, professional English. Authors who are not native English speakers should consider expert editing or language review by a colleague with domain expertise.

Tip: Use Microsoft Word’s “Track Changes” feature for proofreading. Provide both a clean final version and a marked-up version showing the edits.

 

After Acceptance

Online Proof Correction

A PDF proof will be sent to the corresponding author. Please review it thoroughly for any errors or final adjustments. Prompt approval or correction of the proof will help ensure timely publication of your article in Smart Design Policies.

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Articles

Section default policy

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

 

Privacy Statement

We are committed to safeguarding the personal information you provide when engaging with this journal. Any names, email addresses, or other contact details collected through this platform will be used solely for the operational and scholarly purposes of the journal. Specifically, we may use this information to:

  • Facilitate the submission, peer review, and editorial processes
  • Send notifications and updates related to submitted or published work
  • Communicate journal announcements, calls for papers, or policy changes

Your personal information will not be shared, sold, or otherwise distributed to any third parties outside of the journal’s editorial and administrative teams, unless legally required to do so. We implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect your data against unauthorized access, alteration, disclosure, or destruction.

By providing your information, you acknowledge that you understand and agree to these terms. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the handling of your personal data, please contact our editorial office. We will address your inquiries promptly and ensure that any privacy-related issues are resolved to your satisfaction.