Reading Landscape Designs Through Spatial Triad Theory: The Case of High Line

Authors

  • Merve Feyza Ergan İnönü Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, 44280 Malatya/Türkiye.
  • Sevgi Gormus Inonu University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Department of Landscape Architecture, Malatya, Türkiye.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2023tr0010

Keywords:

Inonu University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Department of Landscape Architecture, Malatya, Türkiye.

Abstract

Landscape architects should benefit from spatial theories in social sciences in order to understand the reflections of their designs on space production processes. Lefebvre's theory of space provides an important basis for research in the social sciences. According to H. Lefebvre, the triad of perceived, designed and lived space is based on three interrelated dimensions of space: spatial practice, representational spaces and representations of space. Spaces produced with these three dimensions are social products. In this study, the relationship between spatialization and social transformation is analyzed within the scope of critical analysis through the High Line Park, one of the globally famous landscape designs of the spatial triad theory. Knowledge about the ways in which the process of spatialization affects social transformation makes it easier to understand the role of designers in the discipline of landscape design. The engagement of designers in this process, whether consciously or unconsciously, can lead to an increase in the pressure of design practices on spatial practices. In this context, design practices need to focus on place rather than neoliberal discourses and analyze in depth how the dynamism between the spatial triad can develop.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-16

How to Cite

Ergan, M. F., & Gormus, S. (2023). Reading Landscape Designs Through Spatial Triad Theory: The Case of High Line. Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA, 6(1), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2023tr0010