In Praise of Monumentality: Vertical Urbanism and the Human Condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2026EN0047Keywords:
Tall Buildings, Urban design, Sociological Impact, Master PlanningAbstract
The skyscraper has long represented modernity’s ambition, yet its civic and emotional potential remains overlooked. This paper reexamines the skyscraper through Sigfried Giedion’s framework of monumentality, not as spectacle or isolated icon, but as a medium for collective meaning. Drawing from Heinrich Hübsch, Hannah Arendt, Richard Sennett, Mike Davis, Adolf Loos, and Jacques Derrida, it argues that monumentality in the city of height should emerge from relationships among towers rather than individual objects, from shared visibility rather than private prestige. Integrating lived experience in Dubai, China, and Hong Kong and reflections on Moshe Safdie’s Habitat 67 and Marina Bay Sands, the essay shows how consciously composed density can recover the symbolic dimension that sustains public life. It proposes a renewed ethic of vertical urbanism, where clusters of towers act as civic fields fostering appearance, reciprocity, and wonder, and where height binds aspiration to responsibility and architecture to the human condition.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wayde Tardif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











