In Praise of Monumentality: Vertical Urbanism and the Human Condition

Authors

  • Wayde Tardif Principal, Client Leader M+U, DLR Group, Seattle, WA USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2026EN0047

Keywords:

Tall Buildings, Urban design, Sociological Impact, Master Planning

Abstract

The skyscraper has long represented modernity’s ambition, yet its civic and emotional potential remains overlooked. This paper reexamines the skyscraper through Sigfried Giedion’s framework of monumentality, not as spectacle or isolated icon, but as a medium for collective meaning. Drawing from Heinrich Hübsch, Hannah Arendt, Richard Sennett, Mike Davis, Adolf Loos, and Jacques Derrida, it argues that monumentality in the city of height should emerge from relationships among towers rather than individual objects, from shared visibility rather than private prestige. Integrating lived experience in Dubai, China, and Hong Kong and reflections on Moshe Safdie’s Habitat 67 and Marina Bay Sands, the essay shows how consciously composed density can recover the symbolic dimension that sustains public life. It proposes a renewed ethic of vertical urbanism, where clusters of towers act as civic fields fostering appearance, reciprocity, and wonder, and where height binds aspiration to responsibility and architecture to the human condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Tardif, W. (2026). In Praise of Monumentality: Vertical Urbanism and the Human Condition. Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA, 9(1), 2610047. https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2026EN0047

Metrics